Femi Fani-Kayode, has alleged that the All Progressives Congress, APC,
spent N5 billion to set up a speaking engagement for its presidential
candidate, Muhammadu Buhari, at Chatham House, London, last week. Addressing a press conference on Sunday in Abuja, he
insisted that Mr. Buhari was actually in the U.K. for medical purposes
and that his presentation was hurriedly arranged while he was in London
and his party paid for it. Read what he said after the cut...
The information at our disposal indicate that no less than N5 billion was budgeted for the London jamboree. He said 1,500 persons applied to attend the function but only 200 were allowed in.
He
added that the audience was carefully selected and that most of them
were Nigerian students studying in the Republic of Ireland on a
scholarship by the Rivers State Government.
The students were
threatened that their scholarships would be withdrawn if they refused to
participate in the rally, this was the show of shame that General Buhari has got himself involved in.
Sadly Chatham House offered its prestigious platform to sell a bad product to the world. The
campaign spokesperson also said part of expenses for the speaking
engagement included numerous foreign consultants, air tickets for the
huge delegation, the contingent of governors, hotels bills, the purchase
and renting of vehicles and other logistics.
The ‘arrangee’ Chatham House event is another ploy, like the purported
London interview, to hoodwink Nigerians and prevent General Buhari from
debating in Nigeria. But we insist, General Buhari must debate in
NigeriaAs a party, we are happy over this latest development as it
will no longer give Buhari any excuse not to debate when he returns to
Nigeria. The APC no longer has any hiding place, but to put General
Buhari through a similar coaching course like in the UK, to debate in
our beloved country on any media of choice with our candidate, President
Goodluck Ebele Jonathan” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not in anyway reflect or represent the views of Social Writter